Both Best Actor and Best Actress tend to be stand-alone wins for a film that people liked, just not enough to award it Best Picture.īut it still does help to be nominated for Best Picture, and that’s especially true with Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor. You can’t see any movie win like nine or ten Oscars anymore, not with the expanded ballot. That’s why you see Best Picture winners with such a low amount of Oscars. With the expanded ballot, voters like to split up the biggest prizes among the most popular films, which makes sweeps very unlikely now. In the decades prior, however, it was quite common for Best Actor and Supporting to get swept up in the Best Picture win, Best Actor especially. So far, we’ve had Best Actor match with Best Picture twice now and Best Supporting Actor match with Best Picture three times – and two of those times it was the same actor, Mahershala Ali. Now, in the current era of the expanded ballot, it is rarer that both Best Actor or Best Supporting goes with Best Picture. It was far more common for the Best Actor or the Supporting Actor winner (or both) to match Best Picture. The way it seemed to work was that in the era of five Best Picture contenders, sweeps were much more likely. Where Best Actor and Best Supporting are concerned, they usually come from a film that was nominated for Best Picture.Īs always, in terms of Oscar history we have to look at nominations when there were just five Best Picture nominees (1944-2009) and when there has been an expanded slate (2009-present). There are still some open questions with regard to the nominees. In the last few days, we’ve seen some moves in the Best Actor race, which is far from settled. Download: 2023 Oscar Predictions: Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |